Thread:69.251.120.215/@comment-24170680-20150114035703/@comment-24855095-20150119003915

AscendingKnight wrote: Fro Bro1 wrote: Most of your recent charges have been for "Investigation Interference," which implies that you've been tampering with dispatcher commands and sentencing. That's why I stated that it's best to ignore him/her. It's very likely that troops are present in relocation sites.

Getting rid of the dispatcher won't be very straightforward, especially not on my part. The NAU is still trying to confirm what organization he/she is serving. Even after that's taken care of, we can't just blindly declare war on them. They've done nothing to incite a military response, at least not yet.

I have a feeling you already know who this dispatcher's with, and you're just not willing to tell us. If it's a threat to your allies' welfare, then it's got to come out.

It's a complicated process, and again, we aren't certain. There are several other possibilities that we barely even considered. Besides, if we disclose the organizations we're suspicious of, then it's basically an invitation for unwanted interference. You know how some Wolves and Warrior Cats can be. Mind you, we do not wish to instigate war. We cannot allow our allies to do so either.