Thread:Raymond Goodwin/@comment-71.200.41.141-20140422225527/@comment-14278516-20140423015535

Goodwin has never ridiculed any species. If that were the case, then I would have no purpose in defending him. You have not been around Raymond even 1/4 as much as I have. I personally observed the NAU in its early stages, with suspicions towards Raymond's motives. They proved themselves worthy of the respect of my species. First by eliminating a larger organization known as TREE that held prejudiced views against Warrior Cats and Werewolves (which you may have the NAU mistaken for), and then by proposing that Twolegs, Warrior Cats, and Werewolves should take measures to relieve tension between each other. Seeing that you have not really gotten deep enough into the entire conflict until recently (unlike myself and a handful of others, having observed the entire conflict from its beginning), it is difficult for anyone to consider your arguments credible. It is safe to say that your views toward the NAU, and the entire situation for that matter, are based too heavily off of personal thoughts and the accounts of those who lack credibility (Erin Nightshade being an example) to be taken seriously. Raymond Goodwin is the most credible source, and his argument holds higher priority than that of any of ours (especially biased and/or inaccurate sources). His argument should be heard before conclusions are made.